payday loans

The “Hot Sword of Shock”

Some readers know that the E who appears occasionally in this space is my husband, Everett Shock. Some readers also know that he’s a geochemist on the faculty of the School of Earth and Space Exploration and the department of Chemistry at Arizona State University.  But up until now, no one knew that an organism has been named in his honor.  It’s official, and in print — a newly identified archæon discovered living in the very hot water of a geothermal spring at Yellowstone National Park: Thermogladius shockii.

Thermogladius shockii: if your Latin’s a little creaky, that’s New Latin (the “made” Latin of scientific names) for “Hot Sword of Shock”.  The transmission electron microscopic photo F to the left shows why — according to M.Osburn and J.Amend, the authors of the article in Archives of Microbiology, some individuals sport “occasional stalk-like protrusions.”  (TEM images from Osburn and Amend, 2010)

But the “thermo” of Thermogladius doesn’t really refer to anatomical hotness (despite any claims to the contrary).  Thermogladius is a genus of HYPERthermophiles, tiny, single-celled, anaerobic cocci who prefer to live in very hot, nearly boiling, gas-rich water fermenting complex organic substrates.  What a way to make a living!

Congratulations, E!

Posted by Allison on Nov 5th 2010 06:51 pm | 5 Comments
| View close in,E,etymology/words,natural history category

5 Responses to “The “Hot Sword of Shock””

  1. kate mckinnonon 06 Nov 2010 at 7:26 am link comment

    TOO excellent!

  2. Candaceon 06 Nov 2010 at 6:13 pm link comment

    Congrats to Everett.

  3. Suzanneon 07 Nov 2010 at 12:26 pm link comment

    Wow!! Congratulations, E! What an excellent name, “Hot Sword of Shock.”

  4. Hannaon 11 Nov 2010 at 7:06 pm link comment

    Way cool! And as close to an R-rating as one could presumably get when it comes to Latin names of single-celled organisms!

  5. […] the meantime, we can fantasize about eponymous lightning striking twice: first Thermogladius shockii, now Aphonopelma shockii?  Well, of course not, but you can’t blame us for pretending.  […]

Leave a Reply